Domain Name Com's Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Zoom Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Zoom Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras

Domain Name Com's - : Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Zoom Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras

- Don't listen to ken rockwell, your equipment DOES matter (but he's right about everything else)
Be forewarned,this product may be a little too well made, there are rubber seals at both ends of this lens for protection. Do not tighten the filters too tight; this will cause a vacuum between the lens and filter. I also advise you to buy only NON-GREY MARKET EQUIPMENT from Adorama or B&H. NIKON USA WONT TOUCH GREY MARKET EQUIPMENT IF IT NEEDS REPAIR!!!!!!

Positives

I don't know where to start.

+ Great for Action shots
+ Bokeh is wonderful
+ Sucks in light... If you even think you have enough light you have
enough
+ Well made.
+ Works perfect with a d300. With a little effort and practice you will
get quality results
+ Keeps its value.

NEGATIVES

- Pricey
- Focuses 5 feet from the subject (minimum)
- Heavy (not a problem for me)

Conclusion

These are the lenses that matter (of course this is one of them!)

14-24mm f2.8 ed afs (I plan to get)

50mm 1.8 (sharp and cheap)

24-70mm 2.8g ed afs (Useless range for me I dont need it)

70-200mm 2.8 (both vr and its non vr sibling)

85 mm 1.4 (cream machine)

That's all!!!

The 18-200 vr has disgusting bokeh. My D300 is soo good it raised my standards.

To those who do not want to step their game up to the next level I suggest this. Get yourself a high end Nikon coolpix, a shot of whiskey and some prozac to stabilize you shots, and you'll be fine. Better yet get a canon sd 890IS so you can miss an AA meeting.

Rating:

- Outstanding Lens For Those Who Need The Speed
This lens is one of Nikon's most popular mid range zoom with professionals and serious non-pros willing to fork over $1,700 or so. While there are other Nikon lenses in this zoom range for considerably less money, this one fits the needs of photographers requiring outstanding optics and the speed of a fixed aperture f2.8 lens. (Most kit lenses are variable aperture, meaning the aperture gets smaller as you zoom in.)

I purchased this lens specifically for photographing night football games. I needed the widest aperture in order to capture fast action (using faster shutter speeds) at an ISO that would not result in excessive noise (graininess). For similar reasons, I needed the extra stabilization that the excellent Vibration Reduction (VR) provides, which is why I bought this lens over the similar 80-200 f2.8 that Nikon offers at about half the price. The VR allows you to hand hold the camera at slower shutter speeds, providing the equivalent of 2 stops of additional effective range.

This lens is professional grade - built like a tank and relatively heavy. I use it with a monopod at games for stability. It's features are well documented so I see no need to comment in detail. Just know that the autofocus is very fast and precise and the image quality is superb. Of course, this is true of most of Nikon's lenses regardless of price.

What you're getting by purchasing this lens is flexibility of use and better quality of build. Don't buy it expecting your photographs to magically and suddenly start looking like those you see in Sports Illustrated or National Geographic. Photos of your Sunday afternoon family picnic might not look any better than those taken with the $140 70-300mm f/4-5.6G. However, rest assured that in shooting situations where you need the wider aperture, this lens will blow a kit lens out of the water.

Bottom line: If you plan to take advantage of the wide aperture, this lens is an uncompromising must-have. It is an outstanding lens for those who need its features and capabilities. However, if all or most of your shots are outdoors in bright sunshine, or rarely go lower than f3.5 or f4, this lens is probably more than you need. Save your money and get the excellent all purpose AF-S DX VR Zoom-NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED or the less expensive AF-S DX VR Zoom-NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED.

Rating:

- Terrific lens - lousy service
First, I have to say that this is an absolutely fantastic lens...anyone considering one will know that already, so I'm not saying anything new here. I had the prior-generation 80-200 (which itself was a tremendous lens) and I have to say that this one is better in every category. If you're wondering, yes, it's definitely worth the money to upgrade.

My complaint was with Amazon's partner JR. I purchased this lens through them, even though it was more expensive than some other vendors, because they advertised it as "in stock, but takes an additional 2-3 days". Well, it wasn't in stock at all - and they couldn't tell me whether it was a few days, or six weeks. I ended up having to go through the hassle of canceling my order and hunting the lens down at another merchant.

In fairness to JR, this lens is very popular among pros, and it was just before the 2008 Olymipcs, so apparently a worldwide backorder situation existed for this particular product. Still, advertising it as "In Stock" when it's not seems deceptive to me.

Rating:

- A proper piece of glass
I recently bought this lens to get some sports shots at the Beijing Olympics, and I must say that so far the hefty price has proved to be justified. I primarily use it on a D200, and it focuses really fast, silently, and accurately. Colours, bokeh, and resolution are all great. It is, in a word, great. It is a bit big, though. It's size and weight makes it less than convenient to carry around your neck, but, that said, it is easy to support it with one of your hands while walking around, and it's quite thoroughly thought through in the ergonomics department, making it easy to use.

The VR is a big bonus, and does work quite well. It definitely makes a big difference when shooting indoor sports. I hear Nikon've made an updated version of their vibration reduction technology that's supposedly even better, but the one used in this lens is still good.

I join the already big crowd of reviewers who say that this is one good lens and definitely worth the price. I do, however, think, that if you don't shoot handheld, the Sigma 70-200mm would probably be just as good an investment.

Rating:

- Another fine lens from Nikon
Nikon, like Canon and other manufacturers, produces their fixed aperture zoom lenses to their highest standards of quality. This lens is no exception; most reviewers, and certainly most professional photographers, will agree.

Since you already know this is a good lens, before you buy, ask yourself how you're hoping to use it. This is not a casual walk-about lens; it is heavy, and will make your arm(s) tired. If you're not willing to lug it around, you're not going to use it; any camera lens, no matter how good it is, does nothing for you while sitting unused on your shelf.

If you plan on using this lens exclusively at apertures smaller than f/4, you're not making the best use of your money-- you can spend half as much money, and buy a variable aperture lens that provides the same fundamental imaging capabilities. While this lens is probably sharpest at f/5.6, that's not where it truly shines.

Shooting wide open at f/2.8, this lens performs beautifully. Portrait photography (especially candid photos, such as one might take as a guest at a wedding), medium-distance wildlife photography, outdoor sports photography-- these are all fabulous uses for this lens. I am always pleased to put this lens on my camera and start taking pictures, because I naturally lean towards single-subject compositions, and this lens is perfect for making high-quality images while picking out a subject against an interesting background.

That's not to say it can't take fine images stopped down-- of course it can. When taking landscape photos, I regularly make several images with this lens in addition to what I capture with a wider angle lens.

Buy this lens because you plan to use its unique capabilities, not because you feel you deserve the best. If you won't be pushing the boundaries of a 55-200mm, f/4-5.6 lens (which, for what it does, Nikon's version is a fine lens), you certainly won't be leveraging what the 70-200 f/2.8 has to offer, and would be better off with the smaller, lighter, and cheaper lens.

page 2 of 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Domain Name Registration


	Register Domain Name
	Private Domain Registration
	Domain Name Auction
	Bulk Register Domains
	Transfer Domain Name
	Bulk Transfer Domains
	Manage Domain Names
	Email Accounts

Website Creator


	Website Creator Build Your Own Website
	Website Templates
	Mobile Website Templates

Website Hosting Plans


	Hosting Plans
	Dedicated Server
	Virtual Dedicated Server
	My Server - Account Login

Secure Server Certificates


	Introduction
	Technical Documents
	Purchase Secure Server SSL Certificate

Software


	MS Office Student
	QuickBooksPro 2008
	Digital Photo Editing How To Create a Foto Album
	HTML WebPage Editors
	Top Firewalls
	Networking Software
	Internet Security
	Local Area Networks
	Security & Firewalls
	Software Downloads
	Internet Utilities
	Children's Software
	Programming

Electronics


	MP3 Players
	Camera & Photo
	Office Electronics
	Computers & Ad-On's
	Handhelds & PDA
	GPS & Navigation
	Home Automations & Security
	Compare Prices on Electronics
	Ink & Toner Finder
	Monitors & Projectors
	Internet Webcams
	Blu Ray Disc Drive

Contact Information


	Office Locations
	Customer Feedback

Domain Names Electronics Software
Manage \| Register \| Email Login

Home \| Domain Name Registration \| Software \| Electronics \| Web Certificates \| About Us \| Contact Us \| Help